What Do You Need to Win a Lawsuit for Defamation? Featured Image

What Do You Need to Win a Lawsuit for Defamation?

Have you been the victim of malicious lies and false accusations? As a nationally recognized defamation law firm, we know firsthand the devastating impact that these can have on a person’s life and livelihood. We’ve seen how defamatory statements can cost our clients jobs, ruin relationships, and destroy reputations they’ve spent years building. But you have the power to fight back. Filing a defamation lawsuit allows you to seek justice, restore your reputation, and recover monetary damages.

In this guide, we’ll explain exactly what you need to prove to win your case. We break down each element of defamation, common defenses to anticipate, the evidence required, damages available, and the litigation process. We’ll arm you with the knowledge you need to make informed decisions, maximize your chances of success, and take the first step toward vindicating your good name.

Are you being defamed online? We will get it removed. Contact Minc Law today!

How to Win a Lawsuit for Defamation?

To win a defamation lawsuit, you must prove the following:

  1. A false statement of fact was made about you
  2. The statement was communicated to a third party
  3. The statement caused you reputational harm
  4. The statement was made negligently, or if you are a public figure, the statement was made with actual malice.

Defamation can be libel (written) or slander (spoken). Truth is an absolute defense. Opinions are generally protected speech. Damages may include lost income, mental anguish, and punitive damages.

What Qualifies as Defamation?

Defamation is a false statement presented as a fact that injures a person’s reputation or good name. It comes in two forms:

  • Libel: A defamatory statement made in writing, such as in an email, social media post, newspaper article, or website.
  • Slander: A defamatory statement made verbally, such as in a speech, interview, or conversation.
LibelSlander
Defamatory statement made in writing or fixed mediumDefamatory statement made verbally or in a non-fixed medium
Includes statements made online, in print, or in broadcasts that can be viewed againIncludes spoken statements, gestures, or sign language
Generally considered more harmful since it can be widely disseminated and persist over timeGenerally considered less harmful since it is fleeting and heard by a limited audience
Plaintiff must prove statement was false and caused material harmPlaintiff must prove statement was false and caused material harm, unless it is slander "per se"

To meet the legal definition of defamation, a statement must be more than just harsh, hurtful, or offensive. It must be objectively false and cause real damage.

True statements, no matter how embarrassing, are not defamation. Opinions are also generally protected by the First Amendment because they can’t be proven true or false.

For example:

  • “Jane is a terrible employee who botched the Johnson account and lost the company thousands” could be defamation if untrue.
  • “In my opinion, Jane’s sales skills need improvement” is likely not defamation because it expresses a subjective viewpoint.

The defamatory statement must also be “published,” meaning communicated to at least one person other than the subject. Water cooler gossip, mass emails, online reviews – all could qualify if the content is false and damaging.

Lastly, the statement must directly identify the plaintiff, either by name or by obvious implication. Statements about a large group or class of people usually can’t sustain a defamation claim.

By understanding exactly what qualifies as defamation, you can better assess the strength of your potential case. In the next section, we’ll break down the specific elements you must prove to prevail in a libel or slander lawsuit.

How Do You Prove Defamation in a Lawsuit?

key elements of a defamation claim

To win your defamation case, you’ll need to gather clear and convincing evidence to prove each element of the claim. Here’s what’s required:

Falsity

You must show the statement is objectively false – not just insulting or hyperbolic. Some examples of evidence:

  • Documentation disproving the allegation
  • Witness testimony contradicting the statement
  • Admissions by the defendant that they lied

Publication

You need proof the false statement was communicated to at least one-third party. Evidence could include:

  • Printed copies of libelous material
  • Screenshots of defamatory social media posts or online reviews
  • Recordings or witness testimony regarding slanderous statements
  • Written messages, emails or letters showing the statement was shared

Fault

If you’re a private figure, you must show the defendant acted negligently in making the false statement – that they failed to exercise reasonable care to verify the truth. Public figures face a higher burden and must prove “actual malice” – that the defendant knew the statement was false or recklessly disregarded the truth. Proof of fault could include:

  • Correspondence showing the defendant was put on notice about the falsity but refused to retract
  • Witness testimony that the defendant doubted the truthfulness but shared the statement anyway
  • A pattern of similar defamatory behavior by the defendant

Unprivileged

Some statements, like court testimony or legislative speech, are legally “privileged” and can’t form the basis of a defamation claim. You may need to demonstrate the statement doesn’t fall into a privileged category.

The exact proof required may vary based on your state’s laws and whether your case is libel or slander. An experienced defamation attorney can help assess what evidence you need.

Harm

You must demonstrate you suffered actual damage because of the defamatory statement. Proof of harm may involve:

  • Financial records showing lost business, clients or employment opportunities
  • Testimony from an expert witness on reputational damage in your industry
  • Documentation of medical treatment for emotional distress or mental anguish
  • Evidence of public humiliation or damaged relationships

What Are Some Common Defenses to Defamation Lawsuits?

Even if you have strong evidence supporting your defamation claim, the defendant may raise various defenses to avoid liability. Recognizing and preparing for these common defenses is crucial. They include:

  • Truth: Truth is an absolute defense to defamation. No matter how damaging, a statement that is substantially true cannot be defamatory. The burden is on the defendant to prove their statements are true.
  • Opinion: Statements of pure opinion cannot form the basis of a defamation claim because they can’t be objectively proven false. However, an opinion that implies false underlying facts may still be actionable.
  • Consent: If the plaintiff agreed to the publication of the statements, they cannot later sue for defamation. Releases or waivers signed before the publication can defeat a defamation claim.
  • Privilege: Certain types of speech are legally privileged and immune from defamation suits, such as statements made in legislative or judicial proceedings. The speaker’s motives are irrelevant if privilege applies.
  • Lack of Damages: If the plaintiff suffered no real harm to their reputation, a defamation claim may fail. Still, some types of statements are considered defamatory “per se” and don’t require proof of damages.
  • Statute of Limitations: Each state has a time limit for filing defamation lawsuits. If the plaintiff misses the deadline, the case will be dismissed.
  • SLAPP Claims: Some states have laws against “Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation” meant to intimidate critics. Many defamation suits are challenged as SLAPP suits to get them dismissed early.

An experienced defamation attorney can spot these defenses and develop strategies to counteract them. By anticipating the other side’s arguments, you put yourself in a stronger position to prevail.

What Types of Damages Can You Recover in a Defamation Lawsuit?

A successful defamation lawsuit allows you to recover monetary damages from the person who harmed your reputation. While no amount of money can fully restore a tarnished reputation, damages aim to compensate for your losses. Types of damages available include:

  • Actual Damages: These compensate you for direct financial losses caused by the defamation, such as lost business, employment, or clients. You’ll need documentation like financial statements, tax returns, or expert testimony to prove actual damages.
  • General Damages: Also called “presumed damages,” these compensate for intangible harms that are hard to quantify, like humiliation, emotional distress, and reputational damage. General damages are presumed in cases of defamation “per se” – statements so egregious they’re assumed to cause harm.
  • Punitive Damages: If the defendant acted with malice or reckless disregard for the truth, you may be awarded additional money to punish them and deter similar conduct. Punitive damages are rare and usually require a showing of actual damages first.

Real-Life Examples of Damages Awarded From Defamation Lawsuits

Damage awards can vary widely based on the unique facts of the case, the plaintiff’s profile, and the jury. Some examples of notable defamation verdicts and settlements include:

  • Johnny Depp v. Amber Heard: In 2022, a Virginia jury awarded actor Johnny Depp $10.35 million in damages in his defamation lawsuit against ex-wife Amber Heard. The jury found that Heard had defamed Depp in an op-ed she wrote for The Washington Post. The award included $10 million in compensatory damages and $350,000 in punitive damages, which was reduced to Virginia’s statutory cap of $350,000. The jury likely considered factors such as the impact on Depp’s career, the emotional distress caused, and the need to punish Heard for her false statements.
  • Dr. Luke v. Kesha: In 2014, music producer Dr. Luke filed a defamation lawsuit against singer Kesha, who had accused him of sexual assault and battery. In 2020, a New York judge ruled that Kesha had defamed Dr. Luke in a text message she sent to Lady Gaga, stating that he had raped Katy Perry. The judge awarded Dr. Luke $374,000 in compensatory damages, citing the reputational harm and emotional distress caused by the false accusation.
  • Geoffrey Rush v. Daily Telegraph: In 2019, an Australian judge awarded actor Geoffrey Rush nearly $2 million (AUD) in his defamation case against The Daily Telegraph newspaper. The newspaper had published false allegations that Rush had engaged in inappropriate behavior towards a female co-star during a theater production. The judge awarded Rush $850,000 (AUD) in general damages and $1 million (AUD) in special damages for lost earnings, considering factors such as the serious nature of the allegations, the wide reach of the publication, and the impact on Rush’s career and reputation.

More commonly, damage awards may be in the thousands to low millions. An experienced defamation lawyer can evaluate your case and estimate a potential recovery range.

How Do Anti-SLAPP Laws Affect Defamation Lawsuits?

Several states have enacted “Anti-SLAPP” laws to discourage “Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation” – frivolous suits aimed at intimidating or silencing critics who speak out on public issues. These laws can pose an added hurdle for some defamation plaintiffs.

In states with anti-SLAPP statutes, a defamation defendant can file a special motion to dismiss the case on the grounds that it involves protected speech on a matter of public concern. The burden then shifts to the plaintiff to show they have a reasonable probability of prevailing on their claim.

If the court grants the Anti-SLAPP motion, the case is dismissed, and the plaintiff may have to pay the defendant’s attorney’s fees. But if the motion is denied, the case proceeds to discovery and trial.

Examples of states with Anti-SLAPP laws include:

StateAnti-SLAPP Law Provisions
California- Motions can be filed against any lawsuit arising from protected speech
- Discovery is stayed until the motion is decided
- Plaintiffs must show a probability of prevailing
Texas- Texas Citizens Participation Act (TCPA) allows for the dismissal of suits based on the defendant's free speech, petition, or association rights - Plaintiff must establish prima facie case
New York- Applies to lawsuits based on protected speech related to an issue of public interest
- Plaintiff must show the lawsuit has a substantial basis in law
Florida- Applies to suits arising from protected free speech in connection with a public issue
Washington- Suits arising from statements on matters of public concern can be dismissed
- Plaintiff must show a probability of prevailing

Not all defamation cases are subject to Anti-SLAPP laws, and standards vary by state. An attorney well-versed in your state’s statutes can advise you on the applicability and how to overcome an Anti-SLAPP challenge.

What is the Statute of Limitations for Defamation Lawsuits?

If you’re considering suing for defamation, it’s crucial to act promptly. Each state has a statute of limitations that sets a strict deadline for filing a libel or slander claim. If you miss the deadline, your case will likely be dismissed, no matter how strong your evidence.

Defamation statutes of limitations range from one to three years, with most states falling in the one-year range. However, the clock usually doesn’t start ticking until the defamatory statement is first published or spoken.

Discovery rules can extend the filing deadline in cases where the plaintiff didn’t immediately discover the defamatory statement. In these cases, the clock may start when the plaintiff knew or reasonably should have known about the defamation.

Here’s a sampling of defamation statutes of limitations across the U.S.:

StateStatute of Limitations
ArizonaOne year for libel or slander
CaliforniaOne year from the date the statement is first published or spoken
FloridaTwo years for libel or slander.
New YorkOne year for libel, slander or online defamation
OhioOne year for defamation.
TexasOne year from the date the statement is published or imparted or when the plaintiff should have reasonably discovered it.
Washington D.C.One year for defamation

Given these tight deadlines, it’s essential to consult an experienced defamation attorney as soon as possible after discovering a defamatory statement. A knowledgeable lawyer can quickly assess your claim, gather key evidence, and file your complaint to protect your rights.

Do I Need a Lawyer to Sue for Defamation?

Defamation lawsuits are complex, high-stakes matters. While you’re not legally required to hire a lawyer, having skilled counsel on your side can make all the difference in the outcome of your case.

An experienced defamation attorney will:

  • Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of your claim
  • Gather and preserve vital evidence to prove defamation
  • Interview witnesses and secure expert testimony
  • Draft a compelling complaint that complies with pleading requirements
  • Serve the defendant and handle all court filings
  • Engage in skillful negotiations to achieve an optimal settlement
  • Zealously represent you in court and tackle procedural hurdles
  • Maximize your monetary recovery and fight for a retraction or public apology

Defamation law is a niche practice area with many nuances that vary by state. Defendants are often well-funded media companies with aggressive legal teams experienced in shutting down defamation claims.

A lawyer well-versed in First Amendment issues and Anti-SLAPP challenges will know how to anticipate and counter the opposition’s arguments. They’ll also have a network of investigators, crisis communications specialists, and expert witnesses to support your case.

Hold Your Defamer Accountable and Take Action Today

If you’ve been defamed, you have the right to hold the person responsible accountable and recover what you’ve lost. By understanding the elements of defamation and how to prove them, you’re in a strong position to prevail in a libel or slander lawsuit.

The defamation attorneys at Minc Law are here to guide you every step of the way. We know what it takes to win these complex cases and restore our clients’ reputations. To discuss your unique situation and legal options, schedule a consultation today. Together, we’ll fight to vindicate your name and secure the justice you deserve.

Contact Minc Law

This page has been peer-reviewed, fact-checked, and edited by qualified attorneys to ensure substantive accuracy and coverage.

Related Posts